Sullivan Children, Deaths in NS Jails, Guests Shirley Heafey and Curt Allen

 

This week, we are excited to introduce a new guest, former RCMP Complaints Commissioner, Shirley Heafey. She is joined by former RCMP Deputy Commissioner Curt Allen to discuss her career, her interactions with senior RCMP leadership, and her role in the Robert Dziekański case (where she assisted the responding officers, who were eventually exonerated by an OPP report on the incident).

Also discussed this week, the one year anniversary of the disappearance of Jack and Lilly Sullivan in rural Pictou County, and the latest RCMP statements. We also discuss the death of an inmate in custody, and the lack of information available for such situations. There was an emergency alert issued in Colchester County this week, near the area where the NS mass shootings took place, which is raising fresh questions about the lack of cooperation between the RCMP and Truro Police.

MARK OF THE BEAST: On Lady Bishops and Other Antichrists

 

What if I told you that in a few years that vast majority of Americans will be unemployed because money itself will be no more?

“No man will buy or sell, unless he has the mark of the beast, or the number of his name.”  

But what is the Antichrist? Is it a person? A state? A global technocracy ruled by artificial intelligence?

Whatever it is, politics, culture, and the Church seem to be hastening the rise of the Antichrist… 

Everything, that is, except for the one thing that defied the Revolution and that will soon defy the Antichrist itself.

This episode answers:

• Why did the Trump administration just automate the draft for young men? (Meanwhile, gas hits wartime high of five dollars per gallon.)
• What’s up with the new Vatican alliance that seeks to grant Mother Earth legal rights?
• Why did Elon Musk say that within a few years employment will be optional?
• What exactly is post humanism?
• What is Antichrist?

The Prophecy Magazine That Turned Politics Into Spiritual War

 

John examines how Gordon Lindsay’s Voice of Healing columns connected prophecy charts, election anxiety, Christian Identity themes, and political messaging during the late 1940s. The discussion traces how apocalyptic number cycles, anti-New Deal rhetoric, and spiritual warfare language helped turn ordinary elections into cosmic battles.

The episode compares mid-century revival propaganda with modern New Apostolic Reformation political language, including claims that voting is part of a spiritual war. Rather than treating today’s Christian nationalism as a sudden development, the episode shows how similar patterns were already operating through revival networks, prophecy columns, and Pentecostal publishing.

• William Branham, Gordon Lindsay, And The Voice Of Healing
• The World In Prophecy Column
• Lindsay’s 2520-Day Prophecy Cycles
• Christian Identity, The New Deal, And Election Rhetoric
• From 1948 To Modern Cyrus Politics
• The 666-Day Cycle In The Voice Of Healing
• The 1948 Election As Prophetic Crisis

Keeping Our Republic and Our Souls

 

The appearance by his satanic Majesty King Charles, in front of the Congress (only the second appearance by a British monarch in history, the first of which was his mother, Elizabeth) was a new ratchet down for the United States. Even more scandalous than his treatment by the president, was the obsequious difference shown to him by the Congress. The fright of the “No Kings”protests of weeks ago could not have been more lured. Possibly the most important sentence written in the English language since its inception is this: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.”

It is necessary in these nine weeks leading up to July 4, for those that both understand and endorse that message, to appropriate the national holiday, and to catalyze national celebrations to call the American people to order in the service of those principles. America’s descent into war and other suicidal adventures, mostly conducted on behalf of the British Empire, can only be arrested by a return to the principles expressed in the Declaration of Independence. Those principles are reflected both in the Ten Principles For a New Security and Development Architecture of Helga Zepp-LaRouche, and the words and deeds of Pope Leo XIV.

The Secret British Intelligence War on Iran

 

British intelligence spearheaded the overthrow of Iran's elected prime minister in 1953, bribed officials, staged chaos and used the BBC for a coded coup signal — all to protect oil profits — after previously treating Zionist extremists as the top national security threat. Later and until today, they targeted the Islamic Republic of Iran and developed close collaborations with the Mossad.

MI5 identified Zionist groups like Irgun and the Stern Gang as the primary national security threat to Britain in 1947, prioritising them over the Soviet Union. Declassified files confirm plots to assassinate officials including Foreign Secretary Ernest Bevin and fears that these groups would import ‘terrorist’ tactics to the UK mainland. And in fact the Zionists were pioneers of terror tactic in the first use of the book bomb — in a hollowed out copy of Shakespeare’s plays — which was sent in the post to a British military officer, Roy Farran, addressed to ‘R Farran’. His brother Rex opened the parcel and died from the injuries he sustained. MI5 also tracked Irgun terror networks across the country, including in Glasgow, where notable Zionist luminaries were implicated, including Maurice Bloch, the distiller, who ran the Glasgow Jewish Institute in the Gorbals. This is where the Irgun terror cell regularly met. Also implicated was Isaac Wolfson of the well-known Zionist Wolfson family, which today owns the Next retail chain. Isaac had been the special guest invited to open the Jewish Institute in 1935 and was close to Bloch. Another Wolfson —  Isaac’s elder brother Samuel — had fought with Jabotinsky in the 1914-18 war in the Jewish Legion.

Both Bloch and Isaac Wolfson were implicated in the 1947-1948 Irgun spy scandal, and were called to provide evidence of their knowledge about the spy at the Lynskey Tribunal. Bloch was never charged with any offence, though his name was “erased from the list of Justices of the Peace for Glasgow” as a result. Wolfson was closely cross-examined over payments to the Irgun spy, Sidney Stanley, which were disguised by being split between three separate firms controlled by Wolfson. The focus of the investigation was on corruption, and as Christopher Andrew notes in his official history of MI5, the spying allegations were not raised at the Tribunal. It is unsurprising to note that the descendants of Isaac Wolfson are today centrally involved in the ‘charity’ pipeline, sending cash to the genocidal Zionist occupation forces via, for example, a charity called Beit Halochem. As in the 1920s and 1940s, the Wolfson family remain a threat to British national security.  (more...)

The Secret British Intelligence War on Iran

The lessons from the Gaza student encampments, two years on

 

Two years ago today, activists at Columbia University occupied a campus building, renaming it ‘Hind’s Hall.' While campus protests for Palestine have mostly receded from view, they continue to offer vital lessons for the movement they inspired.

On April 17, 2024, Columbia University students hoisted tents onto the grass of the East Butler Lawn, initiating an international reckoning with the Israeli genocide in Gaza.

The initial encampment was met immediately with a police sweep and the mass arrest of student participants, but this did not deter activists and only prompted a second mass entry into the adjacent lawns mere moments later.

I was at the second encampment as an admitted student attending spring orientation. The dynamism of that moment feels surreal now – hundreds of people waving hand-painted banners and flags, cheering to song and chant, and the almost comical, stiff communication from the university as it attempted to maintain a veneer of business as usual, all a portent of the institutional reprisal to come. I remember standing on the cobblestone that divided the Butler lawns, my eyes glued to the border that delineated the beginning of the grass, resolutely convinced that if I stepped over, I would risk the revocation of my admission.

The dissonance of the spectacle – students in their thousands, reprising the movements of the 1968 student occupations against the Vietnam War, refusing to surrender physical space in pursuit of a total divorce between their university and the genocide – resonated deeply across and beyond American society.

Within days, encampments sprang up at hundreds of other schools. The movement’s rallying cry – “Disclose, divest, we will not stop, we will not rest” – embedded itself deeply into the American consciousness.

On April 30, following the occupation of a Columbia academic building renamed ‘Hind’s Hall’ in honor of Hind Rajab, a five-year-old Palestinian girl martyred by the occupation forces, a second police sweep and mass arrest concluded the Gaza solidarity encampment at Columbia University.  (more...)

The lessons from the Gaza student encampments, two years on

Understanding the shared ideology behind settler colonialism in Native America and Palestine

 

Both the United States and Israel were founded and exist on land taken during ongoing genocides. Settler colonialism drives these genocides, and both nations share an ideology that justifies the theft and rationalizes the killing.

The United States was founded and exists on stolen Native American land, taken in the course of an ongoing national genocide. Israel was founded and exists on stolen Palestinian land, taken in the course of an ongoing national genocide. In both nations, these genocides are a structural part of settler colonialism. And as I will argue in what follows, the ideology grounding settler colonialism in both nations comes from the same source, helping to cement a long-standing relationship between Israel and the United States.

Settler colonialism is a variation of colonialism. Colonialism is the takeover of one country by another to exploit its resources, material and human. Settler colonialism is the takeover of one country by another to settle it with the invading country’s population through the elimination of the Indigenous population and the theft of Indigenous land. Colonialism exploits the Indigenous population’s labor and land. Settler colonialism eliminates or seeks to eliminate the Indigenous population to take its land. That is, settler colonialism typically involves genocide. I am defining genocide in two ways: first, as it is defined in international law in Article II of the 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide:

In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

• Killing members of the group;
• Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
• Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
• Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
• Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

The term genocide was coined by the legal scholar Raphael Lemkin in the wake of the Holocaust and is typically understood to entail a cataclysmic crime whose intent and enormous scale is manifest as was the extermination of six million Jews by the Nazis or the hundreds of thousands of Tutsis murdered by the Hutus in the Rwandan genocide of 1994. But Lemkin’s definition, while pointing to a cataclysmic physical crime, also defines genocide as a daily process of the social and political destruction of a national group:  

Generally speaking, genocide does not necessarily mean the immediate destruction of a nation, except when accomplished by mass killings of all members of a nation. It is intended rather to signify a coordinated plan of different actions aiming at the destruction of essential foundations of the life of national groups, with the aim of annihilating the groups themselves. The objectives of such a plan would be disintegration of the political and social institutions of culture, language, national feelings, religion, and the economic existence of national groups, and the destruction of the personal security, liberty, health, dignity, and even the lives of the individuals belonging to such groups. Genocide is directed against the national group as an entity, and the actions involved are directed against individuals, not in their individual capacity, but as members of the national group. (Axis Rule in Occupied Europe, 79)  (more...)

Understanding the shared ideology behind settler colonialism in Native America and Palestine