Head of World Holocaust Remembrance Center Dani Dayan added to Kiev's 'kill list'

 

The head of the World Holocaust Remembrance Center has been added to the 'Mirotvorets' list. The online catalog targets people accused of being enemies of Kiev, and publishes their personal information, opening them up to attack.

It accuses Yad Vashem's chairman of 'inciting hatred between Israel and Ukraine...spreading Russian-fascist propaganda...and falsifying information about historical figures in Ukraine'.

In clearer terms, Dani Dayan condemned Kiev's choice to rebury and honor Andrey Melnik, a notorious World War 2 collaborator of Nazi Germany.

To discuss this, we speak with Steve Gill, a former adviser to the Bush and Clinton administrations.

Ukraine Is Now Indisputably An Anti-Polish State

 

What Zelensky just did is no different than if Germany gave Governor-General of the World War II-era “General Government” Hans Frank a hero’s burial in Berlin and then named an elite unit after him.

Zelensky’s reburial of former “Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists’” (OUN) leader Andrey Melnik in Kiev with honors and renaming of an elite unit as the “Heroes of the ‘Ukrainian Insurgent Army’ (UPA)”, the OUN’s armed wing, proves that Ukraine is now indisputably an anti-Polish state. As a reminder, both Melnik’s and Stepan Bandera’s OUN factions carried out the UPA’s Volhynia Genocide, which killed over 100,000 Poles. Many of them were women and children who were murdered in very grisly ways.

Poland already spent 4.91% of its GDP on Ukraine, mostly through support of its over one-million refugees that are still living in the country, and donated its entire stockpile to it. Many Poles also donated to charities helping Ukrainian refugees and some even housed them too. All of this was done without any questions asked and with no strings attached in solidarity with Ukraine due to the Polish State’s and many Poles’ intense dislike of Russia for historical reasons beyond the scope of this analysis to detail.

Ukraine was already becoming an anti-Polish state by then, however, as Polish activist Małgorzata Zych wrote in a recent tweet: “These are not Zelensky’s excesses but the consequence of the law adopted in 2015 on the legal status and commemoration of the memory of fighters for Ukraine’s independence in the 20th century, which glorifies criminals from the OUN and UPA, something that has never elicited a negative reaction from the Polish government and which is hidden from the Polish public.”

The public can thus be forgiven for extending such support to Ukrainians, but the government can’t since it knew about this but still aided Ukraine with no political strings attached. As co-founder of Poland’s populist-nationalist opposition party Confederation Krzysztof Bosak said, “Ukraine continues to glorify the perpetrators of genocide and the instigators of unimaginable crimes. The PiS and PO governments slept through the only period in which it was realistically possible to enforce a change in this policy.”  (more...)

Ukraine Is Now Indisputably An Anti-Polish State

Related:

Here’s Why I’m A Proud Volhynia Genocide Activist

Polish president wants Zelensky stripped of top state honor

Pan @G_Schetyna mija sie z prawdą. To nie są ekscesy Zelenskiego tylko konsekwencja przyjętej w 2015 roku ustawy o statusie prawnym i upamiętnieniu pamięci bojowników o niezależność Ukrainy w XX wieku, gloryfikujacej zbrodniarzy z OUN UPA na co nigdy nie było negatywnej… https://t.co/1oJ4KHtRSJ

— Małgorzata Zych 🇵🇱 (@Malgosiazych) May 28, 2026

Stopping contemporary fascism: What is to be done?

 

Contemporary fascism has evolved into a globalized system of authoritarian domination led by the US and its allies, combining military aggression, economic coercion, media manipulation, and institutional capture against resistance movements and sovereign states across the Global South.

The first four months of 2026 will be recorded in the memory of the peoples of the Global South as the period in which contemporary fascism abandoned the last vestiges of hypocrisy. Far from being a mere historical replica of the interwar regimes, this phenomenon has evolved into a transnational architecture of domination led by the elites of the United States and their strategic partners —a hybrid, financialized, algorithmic, and transnational authoritarianism that feeds on digital polarization, institutional capture from within, the commodification of security, and the tacit alliance between military-industrial complexes, technological oligarchies, and reactionary governments — where the threat and coercive use of force have progressively replaced any operative vestige of international law.

The UN and international laws are not ignored out of carelessness or institutional incompetence; they are subjected to a systematic emptying, selectively instrumentalized, and neutralized when they collide with the strategic interests of the hegemonic center. De facto, the law of the strongest prevails, but it is masked in narratives of national security, financial stability, protection of human rights, and other fallacies that function as juridical smokescreens. What until recently was presented as "diplomatic pressure" or "selective sanctions" has been transformed, in an accelerated and structural manner, into massive and arbitrary economic sanctions, direct or covert military intervention, de facto territorial occupation, and planned humanitarian asphyxiation.

From the rupture of the Venezuelan government on January 3 —with the kidnapping of President Nicolás Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, within the framework of "Operation Absolute Resolve" — to the unjustified and treacherous aggression by the United States and "Israel" against Iran, "Operation Epic Fury", launched on February 28 — which has also reached Lebanon as an object of aggression — the US empire has synchronized its blows with a precision that seeks to eliminate all poles of resistance in a single movement.

However, at the beginning of May, the balance is not what Washington expected. It is true: some progressive States in Latin America have fallen or have been neutralized. Argentina has become a laboratory of the far right. Venezuela is under intervention. To them have been added other countries that have subordinated their foreign policies to Washington: Honduras, El Salvador, Ecuador, Chile, Paraguay, Costa Rica, Panama, the Dominican Republic, Bolivia, Guyana, and Trinidad and Tobago, all of which participated in the "Shield of the Americas" summit convened by Trump on March 7, sealing their alignment with the empire's hemispheric strategy within an updated Monroe Doctrine. The dream of a powerful autonomous regional bloc, of ALBA, of UNASUR, has been dismantled, for the moment. An even greater threat now hangs over the region: Cuba and Nicaragua are in the direct line of fire.

But the peoples — that category which desk analysts often confuse with their governments — have not been defeated. On the contrary, in the most extreme adversity, they are discovering new forms of organization and new transnational alliances. Underlying them is a consciousness and a historical memory that fascism will never manage to erase. However, it is decisive that the revolutionary movements be capable of orienting and mobilizing them.

This article aims to provide a diagnosis and a strategic analysis of the situation, identifying the weaknesses that have cost dearly, the threats that are pending, but also the strengths that sustain the resistance and the opportunities that, if well leveraged, can change the course of history. It upholds a fundamental thesis that must be clear from the outset: the most progressive States themselves — even while being capitalist, as well as those that are part of the long-awaited phenomenon of multi-polarization — have the historical obligation to confront this rapidly evolving process of fascistization. Taking a passive, supposedly neutral, stance of "exclusively" national interest — if this were even possible in a globalized world — becomes a boomerang for everyone. Fascism prospers, intends to swallow the weakest and most helpless, but in the end will try to devour the entire planet. This happened with Hitler: he was allowed to advance until, far too late, a limit was imposed on him. Tens of millions of human beings died. History cannot repeat that grave error.  (more...)

Stopping contemporary fascism: What is to be done?

A Discussion on the New Novel 'Palaces of the Crow'

 

In his new book, “Palaces of the Crow,” Ray Nayler examines human nature through the lens of caring and community amidst the often hidden horrors of World War II.

Drone Wars

 

Retracing JFK's path out of darkness

Heil the new German Reich

 

Just don't mention Germany is in breach of the WWII surrender deal. Starmer, the dodo of British politics clutching corpses. P*edos 'R' Us and Harriet Harmthem's dead embrace. What next?Jimmy Savile?

Will Iran Unite the Ummah?

 

Shia Islam emerges as the leader of West Asia

The Dangerous Logic Of Modern Cyrus Theology

 

John explains how the modern King Cyrus argument turns political power into a spiritual mandate, connecting Isaiah 45, apocalyptic thinking, British Israelism, Christian Identity themes, and the New Apostolic Reformation. The discussion traces how claims about God using a political ruler can make human leaders appear beyond criticism, especially when movements frame national and global events as spiritual warfare.

The conversation also examines Gordon Lindsay, Christ for the Nations, William Branham, the Voice of Healing network, and the postwar healing revival as part of a broader historical pipeline into later dominion-focused teachings. By connecting older end-times frameworks with modern political theology, John shows how religious language can reshape how believers interpret power, conflict, government, and national destiny.

• The King Cyrus Theme In Modern Politics
• Spiritual Warfare And Government Power
• Making A Political Leader Untouchable
• William Branham Historical Research Resources
• Christian Identity, Latter Rain, And The NAR
• Gordon Lindsay And The Voice Of Healing Network
• Gordon Lindsay, British Israelism, And Christian Identity Themes
• End-Times Rhetoric And Take Back The Nation Theology

What's the Matter with Europe?

 

The world laments

The 1948 Election Clue Behind Modern NAR Politics

 

John examines how the 1948 United States presidential election, postwar anxiety, Cold War fears, and Gerald L.K. Smith's Christian nationalist campaign help explain older political and religious currents that later resurfaced in Pentecostal and charismatic networks. The discussion traces connections involving Gordon Lindsay, Christian Identity themes, Roy Davis, Wesley Swift, William Branham's movement, and the rhetoric of national crisis, apocalyptic cycles, and spiritual warfare.

Rather than treating the New Apostolic Reformation as a brand-new development, John argues that many of its political and prophetic frameworks have older roots in revival history, British Israelism, Christian Identity, anti-New Deal rhetoric, and opposition to desegregation. The episode also responds to modern debates about NAR criticism, including Dr. Michael Brown's argument that many of these themes predate the modern label, while warning that the deeper history is far darker than many people realize.

• Introduction
• Gerald L.K. Smith And The 1948 Election
• Roy Davis, Wesley Swift, And Movement Connections
• Why Historians Miss The Religious Network
• How Christian Identity Themes Became Spiritualized
• Why Apologists Misread The NAR's History
• Dr. Michael Brown And The Question Of NAR Origins
• The Darker History Behind The Repackaged Themes
• Why Religious Chronology Matters
• The Real Cycle Repeating In Modern Politics

Keeping Our Republic and Our Souls

 

The appearance by his satanic Majesty King Charles, in front of the Congress (only the second appearance by a British monarch in history, the first of which was his mother, Elizabeth) was a new ratchet down for the United States. Even more scandalous than his treatment by the president, was the obsequious difference shown to him by the Congress. The fright of the “No Kings”protests of weeks ago could not have been more lured. Possibly the most important sentence written in the English language since its inception is this: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.”

It is necessary in these nine weeks leading up to July 4, for those that both understand and endorse that message, to appropriate the national holiday, and to catalyze national celebrations to call the American people to order in the service of those principles. America’s descent into war and other suicidal adventures, mostly conducted on behalf of the British Empire, can only be arrested by a return to the principles expressed in the Declaration of Independence. Those principles are reflected both in the Ten Principles For a New Security and Development Architecture of Helga Zepp-LaRouche, and the words and deeds of Pope Leo XIV.

Understanding the shared ideology behind settler colonialism in Native America and Palestine

 

Both the United States and Israel were founded and exist on land taken during ongoing genocides. Settler colonialism drives these genocides, and both nations share an ideology that justifies the theft and rationalizes the killing.

The United States was founded and exists on stolen Native American land, taken in the course of an ongoing national genocide. Israel was founded and exists on stolen Palestinian land, taken in the course of an ongoing national genocide. In both nations, these genocides are a structural part of settler colonialism. And as I will argue in what follows, the ideology grounding settler colonialism in both nations comes from the same source, helping to cement a long-standing relationship between Israel and the United States.

Settler colonialism is a variation of colonialism. Colonialism is the takeover of one country by another to exploit its resources, material and human. Settler colonialism is the takeover of one country by another to settle it with the invading country’s population through the elimination of the Indigenous population and the theft of Indigenous land. Colonialism exploits the Indigenous population’s labor and land. Settler colonialism eliminates or seeks to eliminate the Indigenous population to take its land. That is, settler colonialism typically involves genocide. I am defining genocide in two ways: first, as it is defined in international law in Article II of the 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide:

In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

• Killing members of the group;
• Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
• Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
• Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
• Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

The term genocide was coined by the legal scholar Raphael Lemkin in the wake of the Holocaust and is typically understood to entail a cataclysmic crime whose intent and enormous scale is manifest as was the extermination of six million Jews by the Nazis or the hundreds of thousands of Tutsis murdered by the Hutus in the Rwandan genocide of 1994. But Lemkin’s definition, while pointing to a cataclysmic physical crime, also defines genocide as a daily process of the social and political destruction of a national group:  

Generally speaking, genocide does not necessarily mean the immediate destruction of a nation, except when accomplished by mass killings of all members of a nation. It is intended rather to signify a coordinated plan of different actions aiming at the destruction of essential foundations of the life of national groups, with the aim of annihilating the groups themselves. The objectives of such a plan would be disintegration of the political and social institutions of culture, language, national feelings, religion, and the economic existence of national groups, and the destruction of the personal security, liberty, health, dignity, and even the lives of the individuals belonging to such groups. Genocide is directed against the national group as an entity, and the actions involved are directed against individuals, not in their individual capacity, but as members of the national group. (Axis Rule in Occupied Europe, 79)  (more...)

Understanding the shared ideology behind settler colonialism in Native America and Palestine

Accidentally Married Into A Cult: The Day I Realized It Was High Control

 

John and Liv unpack what it feels like to realize your spouse’s faith is not just “a little different,” but shaped by William Branham’s prophet-claims, tape-preaching culture, and the social rules that come with it. Liv shares the moment she learned Branham was treated as a prophet, why that discovery changed everything, and what it was like facing rejection tied to second-marriage stigma and ethnicity.

They also talk through the lived impact: racism that presents as “sweet gestures,” women-policing women, rigid gender roles at home, fear-based spirituality, and the anxiety that can follow someone long after they leave. The conversation closes with practical wisdom for spouses: don’t force the process, be patient, and let truth be discovered without pressure.

• Introduction
• John Introduces Liv Phillips And Her Connection To The Story
• Early Marriage And The First Signs Something Was Wrong
• Discovering Tape Culture And William Branham’s Authority
• Realizing The Message Operates Differently From Normal Church Life
• When Research Turns Suspicion Into Certainty
• “This Is Blasphemy” — The Shock Of Seeing Branham Treated Above Scripture
• Family Pressure, Isolation, And The Difficulty Of Waking Up
• Marriage, Deconstruction, And Learning How To Support Someone Leaving
• Doctrinal Errors, Fear, And The Control Mechanisms Inside The Message
• Bible Contradictions, Invented Verses, And Ongoing Recovery
• Advice For Families Helping Loved Ones Leave High-Control Religion

Launching the Needed Anti-Colonial Movement

 

Times of India author Mrutyuanjai Mishra provides a valuable reflection on the recent, highly symbolic visit of Britain’s King Charles III to the United States—and that, in particular, from a formerly colonized nation of the Global South. He writes in a May 1 op-ed:

“The 250th anniversary of American independence should have been a moment of clarity, a reaffirmation of the principles that gave birth to a republic. Instead, it has revealed a profound contradiction at the heart of contemporary political life. At a time marked by war, economic strain, and institutional breakdown, Donald Trump chose to celebrate not the rejection of monarchy, but its legacy.”

Mishra continues: “The American Revolution constituted a decisive rupture with monarchy and imperial rule. It was not an extension of British political culture but a rejection of it. The Declaration of Independence established that sovereignty resides with the people, not with a crown or inherited authority. This position diverged sharply from European traditions shaped by thinkers such as Thomas Hobbes and John Locke, whose frameworks, despite their differences, remained tied to hierarchies of power and property. The American founders advanced a more radical proposition: that human beings possess inherent dignity, rational capacity, and the ability to pursue the common good. Government, in this view, exists to cultivate these qualities rather than restrain them under the authority of a sovereign ruler. To celebrate monarchy at the symbolic center of American governance is therefore to invert the very principle upon which the republic was founded.”

If only Americans were as offended at this embarrassment as Mishra is for them!

This topic was taken up in full at the May 1 weekly meeting of the International Peace Coalition. Professor Richard Falk, former UN Special Rapporteur on Palestine, said one reason for Trump’s fondness for Charles was that he sees himself as the “first American king,” and pointed to the increasing alienation of today’s ruling elites from the worsening conditions of life for the average citizen. He attributed this to the Western financial system’s transition from industrial productivity to financial profiteering, which has generated tremendous profits for a wealthy elite while wreaking destruction for the many. Even wars and genocides have become “good for business,” Falk noted, showing the amorality of this system.  (more...)

Launching the Needed Anti-Colonial Movement

The Invisible Empire: How Global Finance Captured the West

 

A century ago, the levers of American sovereignty were quietly handed over to international banking interests. We explore the historical "takeover" of 1913 and why the current fight for resource control is the first real challenge to this old-world order.

The Forgotten Theology Behind King Cyrus Politics

 

John traces how older Christian Identity and British Israelite ideas helped shape later political theology connected to modern dominionism and New Apostolic Reformation language. The discussion follows the thread from anti-Roosevelt conspiracy claims, Gerald Burton Winrod, fundamentalist networks, Fuller Seminary, C. Peter Wagner, and the later use of “King Cyrus” language in contemporary religious politics.

The focus is not on accusing every modern believer of sharing the same antisemitic framework, but on showing how theological patterns can survive after their original context is forgotten. By comparing early twentieth-century anti-New Deal extremism with current appeals to “taking back” government, the episode asks how old apocalyptic and identity-based frameworks resurfaced in new political language.

• Roosevelt, The New Deal, And Early Fundamentalist Politics
• Christian Identity Claims About Jews And The New Deal
• The Protocols And One-World-Government Conspiracy Thinking
• British Israelism And The “Lost Tribes” Framework
• Why Modern NAR Supporters May Miss The Older Roots
• Labor, Economics, And Anti-New Deal Theology
• Gerald Burton Winrod, Charles Fuller, And C. Peter Wagner
• Fundamentalist Leagues And Government Takeover Language
• F. F. Bosworth And Pentecostal-Fundamentalist Networks
• Why Christian Identity Was Not Just A Small Fringe Movement
• Modern Pushback Against Christian Extremist Religion
• Why The Present Crisis Has Older Roots

Perfidious Albion - King Charles Moves To Reassert Power Over The US

 

Harley Schlanger of the LaRouche Organization gives credit where credit is due

The Hidden History Behind The Charismatic Movement And The NAR

 

John and Bob examine how anti-Catholic activism, fraternal politics, and extremist religious networks intersected with early Pentecostal and Latter Rain history. The discussion follows Roy E. Davis, William Branham, Indiana political influence, Methodist participation, and the broader climate that helped shape later restorationist and charismatic movements.

The conversation also explores how propaganda, civic clubs, religious identity, and power structures overlapped in twentieth-century America. Along the way, John and Bob connect those older patterns to later movements, including Christian Identity, the New Order of the Latter Rain, and the environment that influenced modern apostolic and prophetic networks.

• Introduction
• Why This Topic Matters
• The Klan As A Religious And Anti-Catholic Movement
• Roy E. Davis, William Branham, And The Indiana Klan
• Methodism, Protestant Culture, And Klan Expansion
• The Klan As A Christian Fraternal And Civic System
• Money, Marketing, And Power
• Roy Davis In California, Front Organizations, And Propaganda Networks
• Pulling Back The Curtain On Religious Power
• JFK, Anti-Catholicism, And Militant Reorganization
• Why The Same Religious Patterns Still Matter

Trump Rolls Out the Red Carpet for the British Malthusian King

 

Take a step back from the rush of the day’s events, and the fact that the old order has collapsed is dramatically evident. The Western casino economics system is cracking up with debt, crypto, and non-production. The Western military system—whether Global NATO or unilateral U.S. or EU—is exposed as dead-head bellicosity. The Western political and cultural system is seen as an Epstein Class horror show. Emblematic is this week’s trip by the British King and Queen to the United States during the U.S. 250th anniversary of America defeating the British Empire. The spectacle began today with music, flags and red carpet on the tarmac at Air Force Base Andrews, followed by a tea party in town.

The LaRouche Organization has released a statement for Washington, D.C. and international circulation: “The British Are Back To Finish the War of 1812— This Time by Invitation” ,or, “LaRouche Was Right!”

The statement says: … “Who invited the British Royals to address a joint session of the U.S. Congress on the 250th anniversary of the American Declaration of Independence? Formally speaking, the invitation was issued appropriately enough on April Fool’s Day, 2026, by the following fools: Speaker of the House of Representatives Mike Johnson, Senate Majority Leader John Thune, Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer, and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries. But as we’ve seen on too many occasions, it doesn’t seem to be the members of Congress calling the shots, but rather their big-money Epstein-class owners.

American economist and eight-time presidential candidate Lyndon LaRouche was famous for his identification of the British Empire as the source of most of the evil on the planet, particularly since British Lord Bertrand Russell took over science at the turn of the 20th century.

This assessment has not been unique to LaRouche: In 1776 it was the subject of the American Declaration of Independence, which includes a long list of grievances (crimes) committed by the British against the American colonists. The British never apologized for these abuses, but went on to attempt to burn down Washington in 1812, and to promote the slave trade and the Confederacy during the misnamed “Civil War.”

After the United States became an independent republic, the British were also involved in a series of assassinations of American presidents, as documented in a report commissioned by Lyndon LaRouche and written by historian Anton Chaitkin: “Why the British Kill American Presidents.” While the British have never offered reparations for their crimes, it is to be noted that God sent Queen Elizabeth II to hell on the 100th anniversary of Lyndon LaRouche’s birth, September 8, 2022 (and thus bringing her son Charles to the throne).

…”

Helga Zepp-LaRouche, Schiller Institute founder and leader, emphatically made the observation today that “the collapse of the old order is undeniable.” This means that, “it is no longer utopian” to mobilize for a new system. “We must have a new order.”

The extreme danger if this change of direction does not come about is seen in the insanity of certain European nations squaring off against Russia, a nuclear power. German Defense Minister Boris Pistorius issued a statement April 22 about the military strategy of the German armed forces, stressing that Russia poses an acute threat to Germany, and hence a massive mobilization for re-armament is necessary. He proclaimed, “We are developing the Bundeswehr into the strongest conventional army in Europe,” and went into short-, medium- and long-term goals for superiority. The prospects for the German economy to succeed in doing this are delusionary, but the intent itself is madness.

How Dominion Theology Fuels Political Extremism

 

John examines how dominion theology, the New Apostolic Reformation, and the Seven Mountains Mandate can appear from the outside looking in, especially when religious-political language frames entire nations as evil enemies to be conquered. He connects current reporting about charismatic Christian nationalism with a longer history of church growth, lobbying, political influence, and decades-old religious networks.

The discussion also challenges the idea that today’s instability is entirely new, showing how constant media access can make old human problems feel uniquely modern. From C. Peter Wagner’s naming of the New Apostolic Reformation to Lance Wallnau’s King Cyrus framing of Donald Trump, John traces how older religious-political systems continue to shape modern public life.

• The Army Of God Comes Out Of The Shadows
• Why Today Feels Worse Than The Past
• Religion, Politics, And The NAR’s Older Roots
• Lance Wallnau, King Cyrus, And Political Religion