Thursday, May 20, 2021

Skull and Bones: The Racist Nightmare at Yale


George Bush Harriman Skull and Bones oligarchy British Empire colonialism

The U.S. Navy delivered George Bush back home for good on Christmas Eve, 1944; the war in the Pacific raged on over the next half year, with Allied forces taking Southeast Asia, the Netherlands East Indies (Indonesia), and islands such as Iwo Jima and Okinawa.

Barbara Pierce quit Smith College in her sophomore year to marry George. Prescott and Mother Bush gave a splendid prenuptial dinner at the Greenwich Field Club. The wedding took place January 6, 1945, in the Rye, New York Presbyterian Church, as the U.S. Third Fleet bombarded the main Philippine island of Luzon in preparation for invasion. Afterwards there was a glamorous reception for 300 at Apawamis Country Club. The newlyweds honeymooned at The Cloisters, a five-star hotel on Sea Island, Georgia, with swimming, tennis and golf.

George’s next assignment was to train pilots at Norfolk, Virginia Naval Air Station. “George’s duty … was light. As for other young marrieds, whose husbands were between warzone tours, this was kind of an extended (and paid) honeymoon.”

Japan surrendered in August. That fall, George and Barbara Bush moved to New Haven where Bush entered Yale University. He and Barbara moved into an apartment at 37 Hillhouse Avenue, across the street from Yale President Charles Seymour.

College life was good to George, what he saw of it. A college career usually occupies four years. But we know that George Bush is a rapidly moving man. Thus he was pleased with the special arrangement made for veterans, by which Yale allowed him to get his degree after attending classes for only two and a half years.

Bush and his friends remember it all fondly, as representatives of the Fashionable Set  (more...)

Skull and Bones: The Racist Nightmare at Yale

1 comment:

  1. Pope Paul VI was not Magisterial on Vatican Council II since he used the false premise instead of the rational alternative.For more eread the blog Eucharistandmission where Lionel Andrades promote the interpretation of Vatican Council II without the fake premise.
    Since Vatican Council II is interpret with the fake premise by the popes Reign of Christ the King in national politics, it said that there is a developnment of doctrine, meaning Vatican Council II interpeted with the false premise has made extra ecclesiam nulla salus obsolete and so every one does not need to enter the Catholic Church for salvation.
    Pope Paul VI was not Magisterial on Vatican Council II since he did not interpret LG 8, LG 14, LG 16,UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc as being only hypothetical, speculative and theoretical.So there was nothing in the Council-text to emerge as practical exceptions to EENS.Paul VI's premise was false and so was his reasoning in a rupture between faith and reason.
    Cstholics are not obliged to interpret Vatican Council II with a fake premise, inference and non traditional conclusion.
    At Vatican Council II (1965) Cushing, Rahner and Ratzinger made an objective mistake when they approved the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston relative to Fr.Leonard Feeney.The LOHO states that it is not always necessary for a person to be a member of the Catholic Church, contradicting the Catechism of the Council of Trent and Tradition.LOHO wrongly projected unknown cass of the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance as being known and practical exceptions to Feeneyite EENS.This was irrational but the error was overlooked by Pope Pius XII and Pope John XXIII.So St.Pope Paul VI was not even Magisterial on EENS. How could the Holy Spirit make and objective mistake ?
    Pope Francis needs to correct and error and announce that Magisterial documents (Creeds, Catechisms, Vatican Council II, Athanasius Creed etc) must be interpreted with the rational premise, inference and conclusion.Pope Paul VI's interpretation of Vatican Council II was unethical and deceptive.It is not binding on Catholics.